Category Archives: Lawyers

Jeremy Goldstein Recommendation on Employment Incentives

When it comes to corporations, they are many factors which hinder the creation of a sustainable environment for economic growth. At times, addressing these problems is a challenge, Jeremy Goldstein, an attorney, based in New York says these situations can lead employers and investors to lose their incentives if not addressed well. Having experience in large corporations like Bank of America, Verizon Wireless and SBC communications, Mr. Goldstein recommends new ways of approaching this menace and offers an insight of how to handle Earning per Share, performance-based pay and incentives- based programs.


Earnings per share are usually a positive thing when it comes to employees incentives, but when it comes to shareholders, it is typically a mechanism of influencing the stock price. This arrangement usually motivates the shareholders when buying or selling their shares. Moreover, it creates a chance for the company to increase the number of payments they make to employees.


Most antagonists of Earnings per Share program claims that this method leads to favoritism in the corporations while others claim that EPS method does not in any way support the corporate growth in the end. Performance-based pay programs have also received a lot of criticism due to its unreliability and being dynamic.


New York attorney, Jeremy Goldstein, recommends a new compromise between the anti-EPS and Pro-EPS proponents. He says that instead of getting rid of pay per performance programs, which are often used by corporate to provide incentives, a new way should be formed which holds the CEOs and other executives of the corporate liable for their actions. This is by ensuring that the pay per performance goes in hand with the companies goals. It will, in turn, provide a platform for sustainable long-term growth of the company and also repeatable and measured share growth.


Jeremy Goldstein

Jeremy L. Goldstein is an attorney in Jeremy L. Goldstein & Associates, a law firm based in New York. He studied at New York University of Law and has managed to work for large corporate(s) as an attorney. This includes NYSE Group Inc, Cingular Wireless Corporation, Bank of America, Duke Energy, Goldman Sachs and The Dow Chemical Company.


Mr. Goldstein is also a chair in the Mergers and Acquisition Subcommittee of the Executive Compensation of American Bar Association Business Section which offers corporate compensation and governance issues. Also, he is a member of Professional Advisory Board of the Law and Business Journal NYU. Learn more:


Ricardo Tosto de Oliveira Carvalho- Master of business litigation

Brazil is a federal state that is governed by the rule of law. The Brazilian legal system is derived from the Portuguese legal system. Portugal is the former colonial master for Brazil. This was before Brazil gained its independence in 1822. Brazil also draws a lot from other international legal systems and ideologies. They borrow a lot from Germany, France as well as the Napoleonic Code. The Brazilian legal system is a hybrid system which is a product of its civil code and the Italian civil law. The first law school in Brazil was established in 1827 after the country gained independence. As of today, there are over one million lawyers practicing law in Brazil. The legal profession in Brazil is controlled by the Brazilian Bar Association. This is the organization that also approves those allowed to practice law after successfully completing the association bar exam.

For one to become a lawyer in Brazil, one is supposed to undergo a five years undergraduate program in a recognized university. After completing the five years study one is required to graduate with a degree in law. After that graduates are supposed to join a law school in Brazil. At the end of law school, one has to sit and pass the bar examination. Only after passing that one is allowed to join the Bar council. Aft6erwards one should attend an internship program in a legal firm.

About Ricardo Tosto de Oliveira Carvalho

Ricardo Tosto de Oliveira Carvalho is a prominent business lawyer. He deals with highly specialized cases. He has gained prominence for representing clients in high stake and complex cases and succeeded. Ricardo Tosto de Oliveira Carvalho has a law office in Sao Paulo. His office is known for being the pioneers of mass litigation model that have been widely accepted by many law firms.

Ricardo Tosto de Oliveira Carvalho has a legal team that is experienced, skilled and dedicated to serving clients.Ricardo Tosto is also known for mentoring many lawyers that have passed through his law firm for an internship. Ricardo Tosto is also loved by bank clients since he is well versed with both the legal and finance sectors.

For details:

Ricardo Tosto – Highly Respected Lawyer in Brazil

The CBE Annual is a mandatory declaration that needs to be filed for the entities or individuals who holds foreign assets. The last date for submission of declaration of annual CBE is 5th April. However, apart from annual CBE, there is also the need to submit quarterly CBE. It is essential to make a quarterly statement to stay compliant as per the government’s legislation. As per the guideline formed by the Central Bank of Brazil, if the quarterly statement is not made, if the report contains any errors, or are not submitted on time, a penalty of up to $250,000 can be imposed.Ricardo Tosto, one of the most respected and successful lawyer and the founding director of Milk, Tosto, and Barros, said in an interview that it is essential that people file their CBEs on time.

Ricardo Tosto stated that the statement could be uploaded online at the government’s portal and the declaration should be duly filled as per the format is given on the site. Primarily, there are two types of CBEs, which are quarterly CBE and Annual CBE. Ricardo Tosto is one of the leading lawyers in the country and has done his studies in law from the reputed Mackenzie Presbyterian University.He is one of the founding directors of Milk, Tosto, and Barros Law Firm, which is one of the most renowned law firms in the country. Ricardo Tosto has represented many leading public figures, political personalities, multi-national corporations, and premier organizations in the country.

Ricardo Tosto is considered an authority lawyer in the field of compliance law, corporate law, taxation law, finance law, risk management, mergers and acquisitions, and more. Ricardo Tosto started his law firm from a small office but quickly managed to jump the ladder of success to make his law firm one of the biggest in the country.He is the member of the Brazilian Bar Association and the International Bar Association. Ricardo Tosto continues to update himself with any amendments in the country’s legislation so that he can provide reliable and accurate legal counsel to his clients. Over the years, Ricardo Tosto has fought many challenging cases successfully, and many of his cases have become the benchmark in the field of law in Brazil.

Karl Heidek Litagation Attorney

Contact Karl Heideck for litigation help

Contact Karl Heideck for litigation help

What is litigation? Litigation cases can be tried in courts and can range from fraud and corruption to serious industrial accidents.

What is a litigator? A litigator is someone who specializes in taking legal action people and organizations. The litigator addresses the big picture, the entire case from start to finish.

So lets take a look at a very skillful litigation lawyer located near Philadelphia Pennsylvania. His name is Karl Heidak who has grown up and is in practice right now near Philadelphia.

Here is Karl Heidak educational background. Karl received a B.A. in 2003 from Swathmore College in English Languages and Literature with concentration on Letters.

Karl Heidak then attended Temple University Beasley School of Law. At his time at Temple Karl received his degree and graduated in 2009. Karl was then admitted to the Pennsylvania Bar Association in 2010. Karl Heidak has been practicing law ever since 2010 and learn more about Karl.

As you can see Karl has an enormous wealth of knowledge and experience to handle your litigation case. Among other specialties in litigation, Karl is valuable in compliance and risk management cases.

Please feel free to contact Karl Heidak in Jenkintown, Pennsylvania and let Karl help you with all of your court proceedings.

More Visit:

Geoff Cone’s Contribution on Improving New Zealand’s Foreign Trusts

Geoffrey Cone, a renowned tax lawyer in Auckland, New Zealand has responded to a feature on the recent news on the media concerning New Zealand’s foreign trusts. He maintains that the truth just like anything that touches on tax is mundane. He notes that his country is not a tax sanctuary; the essential characteristics of tax haven are that they impose only nominal taxes. With such, there is no transparency and the laws and procedures inhibit the exchange of information with other states. New Zealand does not qualify any of these grounds nor has a highly secretive private banking sector.


In fact, New Zealand was among the first states o feature on OECD’s white list for its efforts in implementing globally agreed tax standards. One way that the country demonstrates tax transparency and accountability leadership is in how it manages foreign trusts as well as the necessities they place on the trustee.


All of these go towards helping other nations that request relevant information. Under the new rules introduced by Michael Cullen in 2006, New Zealand is expected to submit a Foreign Trust Disclosure form by IRD and keep all other financial records for its tax purposes. The information includes trust deed, settlement details, distributions, contact information, and money that the trustee gets and spends.


About Geoff Cone


Geoff Cone is a principle in the Marshall Cone law firm. He is one of New Zealand’s longest serving foreign tax experts. Geoff is a graduate of University of Otago, New Zealand and hold and LLB honors and a post graduate diploma in tax and trust law. He started out his career in 1980 in Auckland, New Zealand before moving to Christchurch. At Christchurch, he was a partner and the Chairman of Partners in a leading law firm. Geoff practiced commercial litigation and tax and trust advisory work. He appeared in the court at every level as a lead counsel.


The Birth of Cone Marshall Limited


Cone returned home in 1997 after working for the British West Indies and established his firm, Cone Marshall Limited in 1999. Cone Marshall is the only legal firm that specializes exclusively in foreign trust and tax planning in New Zealand. It provides trustee management and trust services through affiliate companies.


Operating Pacheso Coto Cone, an asset planning vehicle, Geoff remains a principle in the Cone Marshal although there is little information about the company on its website. Cone has extensive knowledge in tax law and has worked for tax havens and New Zealand for many decades now. He has been vocal in defending the country’s reputation with foreign trusts. The defense is best seen in an article Cone wrote in the Herald back in 2012 about New Zealand’s position which was a model. He clarified that transparency with foreign trusts was used for asset protection and succession planning instead of tax planning.


The SEC Whistleblower Program

Labaton Sucharow is now for being the first U.S. legal firm to exclusively concentrate on representing SEC whistleblowers. They recently had a client who was awarded over $17 million for reporting on significant corruption in the financial industry. This is the second largest award given out by SEC, which gives 10 to 30 percent of the sanctions acquired as the result of a whistleblowing. Although the SEC rules give the whistleblower complete protection from any kind of reprisal, the Labaton Sucharow client elected to remain anonymous.

And this is no unusual. Pretty much all of the whistleblowers have thus far elected to remain unnamed. And SEC itself respects their wishes completely. They usually do not even reveal when a case was participated in by one of these anonymous whistleblowers. Jordan Thomas chair’s the SEC affiliated Labaton Sucharow. He expects the SEC whistleblowers to increase and the work at his firm to pick up big time in the near future. Thomas definitely knows what he is doing. He was for years Assistant Chief Litigation Counsel in the Division of Enforcement. Then he joined the SEC team as its Assistant Director. Thomas has worked closely with SEC on these cases since the beginning and in fact worked on the first case to do battle with an employee who was attempting to retaliate against his whistleblower employee.

With his vast experience on SEC whistleblower cases, it was natural that he become the chair of Labaton Sucharow after it decided on a full concentration on SEC whistleblowers. But the firm was established about 50 years before that. Shortly before the hire of Thomas, Labaton decided to concentrate completely on representing SEC whistleblowers. Its platform is officially titled, the Whistleblower Representation Practice. This practice is girded with some of the best investigators, financial analysts, and forensic accountants in the world, which, needless to say, has also made Labaton one of the best Whistleblower firms in the world.

Labaton has also often found a ranking in lists of the best plaintiff litigation firms in the world. And its scope is the entire world as well, representing whistleblowers wherever they may be found. You can read further details of Labaton Sucharow at And you can find more information about the whistleblower program at To make sure that there are always enough funds to make substantial awards, Congress has set up the Investor Protection Fund which currently has more than $400 million.